Sharkscope
 

Tracks MTTs and SNGs on Pokerstars. It's pretty cool.

nice, dont expect to see me in there:)

Username----Count----Av.Profit----Av.Stake----ROI----Total Profit----Form
eeejit101------32--------$19---------$21-------81%----$552---------Tilt
Rogue23-------96--------$19---------$69-------29%----$1124--------Super Tilt
Bunnyki$$-----73---------$-1---------$2--------10%-----$-61----No Comment
JDpoker$tar7---151-------$25---------$73-------52%----$2864--------Tilt
mayhem45 ----174--------$-1---------$31-------27%----$-638--------No Comment


I love that.

Sweet, I've got a shark icon.

BTW... I assume a couple of those ROIs are actually negative, but you can't tell because of your dashes used for spacing...

NO, they were all positive and i had a moving shark icon, and JD was a shark too

For those wondering what "Form" is:

How is Form calculated?
Hot is 3 payouts in a row. Super Hot is 6 payouts in a row. Tilt is 4 losses in a row. Super Tilt is 8 losses in a row.

Also interesting:

What proportion of online poker players make money?
1/3rd of players are profitable. 2/3rds lose money.

Also interesting -

MY FUCKIN ROI IS 81%

Sorry, had to point it out

For anyone with a negative number, this should make you feel better (Scott Fischman):
emptyseat88 190 $-67 $587 24% $-16517

As will this (damn, Josh!):
Sdouble 1321 $5 $256 6% $-14644

And how about THIS???
The Grinder 298 $-193 $3336 1% $-78027

Damn, that makes this guy look good!
stormswa 208 $0 $4 -5% $-170

Crap... I'm only allowed 10 searches per day. Will someone please, please, please get us ZeeJustin's numbers???

on it now

Holy shit, maybe he is not bad


ZeeJustin 594 $100 $628 13% $41116 ----

I hope they add a Top and Bottom 10 (or better yet, 100) list for each category. Would love to see those numbers.

And cos i think Moneymakes is a crap player, this seems to agree...

Money800 57 $-73 $329 6% $-5140 ---

This doesn't surprise me one bit. I expected to see a huge number here. What surprises me is The Grinder's results. Fischman's too, I guess.

My 81% ROI has to be up there.... its now 83% as i just won 2 in a row..

fossilman? He just had a huge score, so I'm sure that will skew his results.

This is the only fossilman they had -

FossilMan 14 $-224 $507 -15% $-3422 - pokerstars


1 search left so make it good TP

Lol
 

TonyCheval 15 $-2 $10 -22% $-51 Super Tilt pokerstars

Sure wish they had UB, played plenty of MTTs there.

Thats officially the worst so far discovered for a TP member, but to be VERY fair to tony, he is a UB player, and there i prolly a different story

I found worse.... just didn't think it was my place to post them. :)

Can anyone explain this to me? lol ,sorry to be a pain..


John_Stewart 240 $3 $10 12% $383 - pokerstars x

Yeah, I don't fare too well in 1000+ player tournies, and I bubbled that SnG last night. :p

Did you read the FAQ on their site? Most of the numbers are self-explanatory, I think.... except for how they count tourney fees in your gross but not for your ROI (or something like that).

Hah, 240 tournaments with an average $3 profit? At least it beats a loss. :D

thats $720. Not bad IMO.

So I THINK Im getting these numbers...so, since I have a busted bankroll, does this mean I should stay off the ring games?

Also, it's not so much that I prefer UB, it's just that they had a tasty 100% reload bonus that happens to take forever to earn, so while in Rome.. ;)

These numbers are for STTs and MTTs. If your losing at ring games, and you are $3 a tourney in profit, play these, but my suggestion, find a way to 20 table:o

I can settle for $3 a tourament, Its still a HELL of a lot better than losing though.

If it makes you happy man go for it all day every day.

GL:o

Im not playing for the money as much as I am for the entertainment. So If I can do what I like to do, AND still make a profit (even a small one), I think its a win-win situatoin. :)

then play that tourney till you win $3 and quit man.

if you love it then do it.

Not sure how all y'all are gettin' it to work for you. Neither Nikki or I are able to search. We type in a username, hit search...and....nothing. Thinking it was because the developers suck and somehow broke it in Firefox I tried IE. Nope, nothing there either but IE tells me there's a javascript error.

same here

It is Broken
 

It says I am a shark.. must be broken.

Bah
 

It is CASE SENSITIVE and does not always report when it fails a search. I has issues.

Oh and Since..
 

Since yall are bragging, 68% ROI is not too Pshabby:

SirFWALGMan 161 $11 $11 68% $1642 - pokerstars x

Actually, it's $383, total (see "Total Profit"). That's the important number, which I believe includes the buy in fees.

I think it's ridiculous that it's case sensitive. Hopefully this is an early version of it and they will improve it over time.

Robbie Robb 96 $0 $5 13% $-52
N1kita 62 $0 $2 87% $-9

And I totally don't get their ROI. How can someone have an 87% ROI with a NEGATIVE total profit? Again, it must be the fees, but to go from 87 to < 0... :confused: That's a lot of fees.

83% ROI baby.

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

This site is crap. Read the FAQ, sounds like it was written by a SWA, no offense.

:confused:

I don't really trust their numbers (they seem to be missing a lot of data), but it is definitely better than nothing.

It says they miss some tourneys during prime time, but whatever, im sure they will get better in the future, although I can see this getting banned if they start charging for it. Its the same thing as poker prophecy was for party poker.

What do you mean banned? Banned by whom, and how so? It's just a database, like thepokerdb - but much more inclusive (with totals, and not just a list of cashes).

Poker prophecy was the same thing, once money gets involved, party poker doesnt like it. Im sure stars wont mind though, Lee Jones is a pretty lenient guy.