Pokertracker Stats
 

I don't even know what all this means, but figure the best way to find out is just post what I see and you guys can tell me if theres any obvious flaws.

Also, these are really the only stats that I know how to find on Pokertracker and I see you guys are comparing many ones I am not listing here: where can I find those so I can let you see them too ?

NL $1/2 6 max.

hands: 3,293

Vol. Put $ in Pot: 40.74

Vol. Put $ in from SB: 61.61

Folded SB to steal: 68.29

Folded BB to steal: 47.83

Won $ WSF% : 41.29 (dont know what that means)

BB/100 hands : 25.89

went to SD %: 24.65

Won $ at SD % : 52.50

PF raise %: 24.81

Time I tried to give back...
 

I can take a stab at answering some of these. After all, I taught computer software classes for years, so if nothing else I know how to answer the same question over and over. :-)

The stats we've been talking all come from the "More Detail" button on the "Ring Game Player Statistics" window. Make sure your own id is selected, of course. I'm using version 2.10.00d, so if yours is older you might not have all of them.

Of course I have no idea whether these stats are good or bad for NL or 6-max... the experts will have to comment...

If that's not a typo, I just may retire and hand the keys of the forum over to you.

That HAS to be a typo, right?

BB/100 hands: 25.89

Hand Um Over. :D

Nah. You're playing NL (my bad - I missed that). That stat means nothing any more. ;)

For a second there, damn.........................

OH :(
Well - wuts a good BB/100 for NL. I am very happy with what is now and don't expect it to stay quite that high for too long a time, but wut # should i be looking to maintain?

15PTBB/100 is phenomenal
10PTBB/100 is great
5PTBB/100 is good
>5PTBB/100 is adequate
(PTBB are 2x the BB in the game, ie 25NL each PTBB is .50)
But these numbers aren't even somewhat valid until 20K+ hands.

so.... why use PTBB ???
and do u just divide the BB/100 by 2 to get PTBB ? I dont get it.

Because pokertracker displays them incorrectly so the $ value is inconsistent with the BB/100 value.