The TalkingPoker.com Forum

The TalkingPoker.com Forum (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/index.php)
-   Beats and Brags (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Wow (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3086)

JDMcNugent7 09-06-05 02:35 AM

Wow
 
WoW, wait till u see what i got re-raised with, and beaten on by the damn turn and river. This guy lost all the money he won from this hand in about 10 hands later tho and i made a comeback. Still sucks he had to get ucky against me.

PokerStars Game #2510313795: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2005/09/06 - 02:09:21 (ET)
Table 'Megaira II' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: TrIpPiN_bDc ($46.85 in chips)
Seat 2: thegame909 ($24.30 in chips)
Seat 3: aeropin ($41.65 in chips)
Seat 4: greendogs ($23.85 in chips)
Seat 5: j0shooah ($56.60 in chips)
Seat 6: McNugent ($54.25 in chips)
thegame909: posts small blind $0.25
aeropin: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to McNugent [Ac Kc]
greendogs: calls $0.50
j0shooah: folds
McNugent: raises $1.50 to $2
TrIpPiN_bDc: folds
thegame909: calls $1.75
aeropin: raises $1.50 to $3.50
greendogs: calls $3
McNugent: calls $1.50
thegame909: calls $1.50
*** FLOP *** [2c 3s 6c]
thegame909: checks
aeropin: bets $10
greendogs: folds
McNugent: calls $10
thegame909: calls $10
*** TURN *** [2c 3s 6c] [3c]
thegame909: checks
aeropin: bets $28.15 and is all-in
McNugent: calls $28.15
thegame909: folds
*** RIVER *** [2c 3s 6c 3c] [6s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
aeropin: shows [5d 3d] (a full house, Threes full of Sixes)
McNugent: mucks hand
aeropin collected $97.30 from pot
McNugent said, "lol NICE HAND, 5 3, wut a monster"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $100.30 | Rake $3
Board [2c 3s 6c 3c 6s]
Seat 1: TrIpPiN_bDc (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: thegame909 (small blind) folded on the Turn
Seat 3: aeropin (big blind) showed [5d 3d] and won ($97.30) with a full house, Threes full of Sixes
Seat 4: greendogs folded on the Flop
Seat 5: j0shooah folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: McNugent mucked [Ac Kc]

BrianSwa 09-06-05 02:40 AM

Ok
 
why were you in this hand after the flop?


nevermind didnt see the flush draw.

I pobolly would of layed it down on turn when board paired.

Talking Poker 09-06-05 02:50 AM

You pobolly would have layed down an Ace high flush because a pair of 3s hit the board? Are you even serious?

BrianSwa 09-06-05 02:53 AM

yes
 

all in bet of $27 yea I would TP, I would put someone on a set with the raise on the flop and then the all in when the board pairs I would think I was drawing dead.

I would have to put someone on 66 or 22, I would want to wait for better spot to put my money in but then again you know I play very conservative. It might be right play but thats what I would do.

damn wait, im not reading the boards right I thought the flush didnt make it now I see it did. Terrible beat played it fine nugget. If i was still drawing at the turn I would lay it down but since the flush made it id call almost every time.

Talking Poker 09-06-05 03:01 AM

You're not making any sense. You say you would have put someone on a full house, so you would have folded what you thought were overcards and a flush draw. Then you realize he actually had the flush already, so then you say you would have called against what you thought was a full house??? Ummm.... a full house still beats a flush, dude. If you (incorrectly) put your opponent on a full house, why on earth would you call with just a flush?

You're making my head spin here.

BrianSwa 09-06-05 03:04 AM

hehehe
 

sorry its late, I didnt really look how much was in pot compared to the all in bet. Most likley if I already had the flush I would probolly have pot odds to call the all in bet. If I didnt have the flush yet I dont think I would of had pot odds to make that call but with the flush already I think I would have it because I would be ahead more then behind. Does that make sense?

Zybomb 09-06-05 04:54 AM

You can justify laying the hand down to a flop bet, but I believe the implied odds make this an acceptable call even though the pot odds arent there.

On the turn you absolutely call. Brian, you'd fold an Ace high flush because of a paired board of 3s? If you were still drawing yes, a fold is correct. But I have one question -- What set did you put him on, on a 2,3,6 flop with his preflop RERAISE?

sjay2k 09-06-05 07:47 AM

Push all in on the flop.

BrianSwa 09-06-05 11:06 AM

yea
 

Yea I read the board wrong and made a mess of this thread, sorry about that. I agreed afterwards that the call on the turn was correct. Very slim chance of a full house but at this level it is very possible with the preflop raise but im calling here 95% of the time also.

JDMcNugent7 09-06-05 04:53 PM

lol, i guarentee if he didnt get lucky and win that hand, brian u would have never said u would fold to that bet, and if u would fold to that bet ur missing out on alot of money anyway.

BrianSwa 09-06-05 05:16 PM

K
 

didnt I just say I read the board wrong like 10 times? If you have the flush I call if you are still chasing it on turn I fold.

omahilo 09-06-05 05:37 PM

LOL fold the ACE high flush because the board pairs? LOLOL!!!!

GeoffM 09-06-05 05:38 PM

I think you played it just fine, however you might have fucked up on the river if.......................you didn't add dickbag 3-5 to your buddy list for future reference. :D

BrianSwa 09-06-05 05:43 PM

hello
 

omg this is like a broken record, I READ THE BOARD WRONG i DIDNT KNOW THE FLUSH MADE IT. , I thought he was still drawing to it.

johnp158 09-06-05 06:33 PM

I couldn't even finish reading the thread from laughing at this. Too funny.

BrianSwa 09-06-05 06:36 PM

urg
 
I GIVE UP , fine since no one wants to read what I said sure Im folding the nut flush, hell im even folding the nut flush if board isnt paired! have feild day kids.

Talking Poker 09-06-05 10:50 PM

I hear what you are saying Brian. Really, I do. But what I can't seem to get past is you insisting that you would fold an Ace high flush here. It just seems so wacky.


( :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: )

BrianSwa 09-07-05 07:19 AM

nope
 

if I said that then I was mistaken, id fold the flush draw here not the flush.

Talking Poker 09-07-05 11:33 AM

I know. You'd fold the flush. We get it already. Geez. Can't we just agree to disagree?

BrianSwa 09-07-05 12:31 PM

ohhhhh
 


its comming, I see it the wrath of brian will be upon you mortal. You are lucky im a lover and not a fighter.

Talking Poker 09-07-05 01:41 PM

Ew.

BrianSwa 09-07-05 02:00 PM

hehe
 

LOL

junYUN 09-07-05 02:36 PM

i think what everyone is getting at is the fact that you said you would figure your opponent had ALREADY made a full house. so, if you assume that, you would call with a flush?

dood, you're a complete bi-polar mongloid. i cant even read your stupid ass posts, i have to skim through them because they don't make any sense anyway.

BrianSwa 09-07-05 02:41 PM

hmmm
 

but yet you comment on them all the time, interesting!

BrianSwa 09-07-05 02:47 PM

I said it was possible at these low limits that he made his full house already and if you didnt have the flush already (which is what I thought) then you cant make that call. With nugget already having the flush this was a easy call though, yes I made a mistake and missread the board. If I would of read board right and saw the flush made it I would of never posted that in the 1st place. Im Bi-polar because I made a mistake another interesting comment from our friendly neiborhood jerk junYun.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com