![]() |
New Section Suggestion.
I think there should be a section for Brian's hand histories. He's back in the game now, so I think we should expect ~5 hands per day.
Any chance of him having his own section? I'm completely serious about this, btw... |
LMAO.
In the words of Kurt Angle: "It's true, it's damn true." |
hey
I private messaged TP and asked him if it was a problem that I post so many, I will also ask here. If me posting so many is annoying or a problem for anyone let me know and I will cut down. Most time dont relize ive put that many up until im done for night then I look back up and am like damn. My own section would be cool though but I dont see it happening. |
Sadly, I don't see it happening either.
A few months ago (was it even that long?) when you were playing ALOT of poker, I remember a shitload of HHs. It just seems like you're posting them to show us how you played a hand. Instead of posting one of your HHs, which most people overlook anyway, ask a question if you really want to know something. I don't think any of us care that some fish called your pot sized bet w/ a draw, even though you were holding the nuts. Whatever. |
that sounds fair....dont want to flood this and turn it into another crappy forum
|
Here's an example. I just read one of your hand histories...
4 players called your UTG PFR of 25c in a 5c/10c game. You're holding A4s. (Not even going to discuss the problem with that...) Anyway, 5 players see the flop, you spike 2 pair, and go all-in, first to act. Idiot calls with JJ, and you win. C'mon man. |
K
NP man. |
I have yet to read the latest batch, and I'm not one to discourage poker discussion, but what Aeq is saying is correct. If you have a Hand History you'd like to discuss - especially if you have a SPECIFIC question, by all means post it. But try not to post a bunch of "How did I do?" hands, especially when they are relatively no brainers (ie, slowplaying quads).
Personally, *I* prefer discussing hands that put ME to the test - ie, I'm the one on a draw or I'm the one with a marginal hand and I'm trying to figure out what my opponent has and if I should make that big money call on the river or not... as opposed to hands where I'm WAY ahead and I take all the guy's money. Sure, that's fun and all, but what is there is discuss? |
P.S. Brian isn't getting his own section.
|
Phuuuullleeeeeeeezzzze????
|
I second that!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com