worst players
 

I used to think pacific Had the worst players.But I am starting to think Full tilt
is running neck and neck now.At full tilt I seem to get beat by runner runer alot more than other sites.Anyone else agree?

I've only played PS but I've been thinking about Full Tilt. I'm unsure if I want to spread my bankroll across multiple sites or have it sitting on one site for that one time I'm feeling frisky enough to sit at the bigger table(s).

Actually, I find it interesting the progression of moving along to larger blind tables. I only started playing online about 4 months ago and I started playing on the .10/.25 table, then moved on to the .25/.50 table but got tired of that quick. Now I'm up to the .50/1.00 tables (YIPPPEEE) and its paying off for me. I don't see myself moving higher than that anytime soon though.

What I would really like to do is sit at a B&M table....I have to imagine the play is a bit different. I wouldn't know though.

-Studio-

*useless post - I know*

the worst are at party poker.

nvm.. then again it all depends on when and what limit you play. whether its real or play. in play moeny evryone plays like shit.. well almost everyone. in realmoney pocker change limit most people are donk. where in higher liit it like 5/10 nl you have the occasional donks but mostly good people. the stake also dependson the site.. the 5 /10 nl im atalking about is at poekr stars.

i actually find that full tilt poker is a lot easier in sit and go's and tournaments than most other sites. i am a fairly loose player and i think that full tilt definitely has many more tight players than say pokerstars which is why i play on full tilt

Maybe its my limits 50c $1 limit and 25c 50c nl.Maybe I am the donk...

no those limits are okay.. for instance on star there are btter players in .05/.10 nl than in .10/.25 nl and alot of decetn tight players in .25/.50 nl but thats on pokerstars on site like party poker its a shit hole where everyone will call you

you know tight only define aplayes skill to a certain point if anybody who just played "tight " was good then poker wouldnt be so popular.. alot of the good players.. like my friend HoldemPhil (amazing at hu.. google his name if you dont believe me) he doesnt just play tight.. he plays instinct plus pot odds and iplied odds and all that other good shit. Playing tight is only a substituite until you master those other skill.. but you still play tight soemwhat when you do master them...

and if your preferr to play partypoker over a site like stars..(just an example) then you can never say thatpoker is a passion as somewould call it.. youre just some money greedy bitch(pardon my french..lol) because any decent player can do amazing on party but shitty on stars.

Party Poker
 

I think Party has the worst because they target the bad people who watch the WPT.

When i play FTP i lose alot by runner - runner but when i play on pokerstars that never happens. I think on FTP more people are more riskier and are willing to take chances then on pokerstars.

i think the worst playes come from prima poker they totally suck