wtf is this crap
 

PokerStars Game #5503540976: Hold'em Limit ($1/$2) - 2006/07/09 - 13:19:42 (ET)
Table 'Pallas III' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: kkirk1329 ($18.75 in chips)
Seat 2: pokerbabi ($11 in chips)
kkirk1329: posts small blind $0.50
pokerbabi: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kkirk1329 [As Ad]
kkirk1329: raises $1 to $2
pokerbabi: calls $1
*** FLOP *** [Tc Qc 4s]
kkirk1329: bets $1
pokerbabi: calls $1
*** TURN *** [Tc Qc 4s] [2d]
kkirk1329: bets $2
pokerbabi: calls $2
*** RIVER *** [Tc Qc 4s 2d] [2s]
kkirk1329: bets $2
pokerbabi: raises $2 to $4
kkirk1329: raises $2 to $6
lumpers joins the table at seat #4
pokerbabi: calls $2 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
kkirk1329: shows [As Ad] (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
pokerbabi: shows [2c Ah] (three of a kind, Deuces)
pokerbabi collected $21 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $22 | Rake $1
Board [Tc Qc 4s 2d 2s]
Seat 1: kkirk1329 (small blind) showed [As Ad] and lost with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 2: pokerbabi (button) (big blind) showed [2c Ah] and won ($21) with three of a kind, Deuces

It looks like somebody trying to go bust by playing heads up at too high of stakes for their bankroll.

i won 520$ on titan remember?

I wouldn't play HU at $1/$2 w/o a minimum of a $1k bankroll. You have 250 bets. That's 2-3 bad days in a row, and I'm referring to 6-max. Heads up has much more variance.

I seriously think 750-1000 BBs is the necessary roll for shorthanded games.

Actually, I've been wondering about this.... Does HU really have more variance than 6 max? I mean, you've only got 1 opponent to beat, right?

I realize why 6 max has more variance than full ring, but I think by the time you get to Heads Up, it may actually go the otehr way. I'd need to think about it some more though - I'm not sure.

Don't get me wrong - obviously the PER HAND variance is going to be WAY higher, as you will be playing pretty much every hand, but I wonder if it's more likely to even out faster over the course of a session too...

i honestly had no clue about that. good explanation, but its still a ridiculous beat.