View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-12-07, 05:29 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

The article explains this:

With a $100 "max" buy in for a NL game (in theory - keep reading), this should allow for at least a $1000 tourney buy in. But think about it, just because you are playing in a $100 NL game doesn't mean you couldn't wager $500 or more if you built your stack up to that.

I love that this law was clearly written by people who don't understand poker. Actually, the article takes it one step further, questioning if the $100 "required" buy in is a minimum or a maximum. Hello!

__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker