Ugh. Can someone please translate/summarize that for me? Someone.... anyone....
OK, never mind - I skimmed it. After the "blah blah blah blah blah" 90% of it (again, I'm not trying to be a dick, but Brian, we've been through this same thing with you time after time after time after time where you go from taking poker seriously to playing like an idiot and tilting off your entire roll to never playing again to playing but just for fun to taking poker seriously to (continue loop indefinitely))... Anyway, after all that, I noticed you actually got back on topic in the last paragraph.
I just want to make sure... You do realize that
> = greater then and not less then, right?
Also, you do realize that someone with an aggression factor of 2 (for example) is less aggressive than someone with an aggression of 4.5, right?
Cause, what you are saying seems to imply otherwise. I mean, for you to classify someone with a 2 AF as aggressive when you say yourself that the average player is greater than a 4... well, that doesn't really make sense. At all.
But whatever... I was only posting in this thread out of concern for Invigilator. And like you do at every opportunity you get, you've turned it into a thread about you... and honestly (again, not trying to be mean here, just stating a fact), I'm not really interested.
That said, if you really do decide to take poker seriously and play well and win gazillions of dollars, PLEASE, by all means, do it. I'll be the first to congratulate you when you do. But along the way, you need to cut those of us who know you best a little bit of slack... I mean, we've been down this road (numerous times) before, so it's only natural for us to expect the same results.
|