View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-15-07, 02:33 AM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

A lot of low stakes players think that high(er) stakes games should be raked more than lower stakes ones for some reason, despite the fact that it takes the poker site (or B&M poker room, for that matter) the exact same amount of resources to run a high stakes table as it does a low one.

Me, I think it's fair raking all tables the same - x% up to $y maximum. I can't think of a single reason to punish the guys playing higher stakes by raking their tables more.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker