View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-05-05, 02:01 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

I don't care about the % either. I think they should vary the REQUIREMENTS to clear it based on past history. It seems stupid to me that I need to play 10x (or whatever it is) hands of 10/20 6 max when someone else can play 10c hands of .25/.50 full ring and we both clear the bonus. His variance on the low limit game all but guarantees him a win, where I could easily be $1000 or $2000 in the whole by the time I clear the bonus.

In other words, I think it should be based on RAKE, and not RAKED HANDS. After all, that's what it really comes down to in the end anyway.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker