Why the hell wouldnt he just put in what player A had if he knew PLayer C still had to act behind him before player A, but anyway, even though he verbalized that he was intending to put player A all in, i think since he put $95
in the pot, thats his bet. Its his stupidity, and player C is also retarded for saying call and putting in more chips then are needed to call, but i guess he thought he was being put all in. Anyway, if I was sittin' at this table I would say, Player B's bet is 95 and Player C is to call the 95
|