What in the world from this hand makes you think the site is rigged? That a big name player was dealt AA? Or that the K3 didn't suck out?
Sorry, but I can't help find it amusing that no matter who had the AA here and who had the K3 and how the betting went down and who ended up winning the pot, SOMEONE always thinks the mite must be "rigged." God forbid it's just, you know.... poker.
I would expect (and still disagree with) that sort of comment if Phil had the K3 and won the hand, but by AA holding up???
People are funny.