View Single Post
  #2  
Old 09-10-06, 11:32 AM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Maybe I'm not readingf the numbers right or I'm just not understanding, but take this for example:

TAMPA BAY (3.0) Baltimore +3
Baltimore
63.4
36.6

Doesn't that mean that 63.4% of Joe Public are taking Baltimore? And if so, wouldn't we want to bet against them? Maybe I just don't understand the format you are using.

Also, keep in mind (and I know you know this) that sportsbooks are profitable because of the juice, not because Joe Public is clueless. If they take $11,000 in bets on Tampa Bay and $11,000 in bets on Baltimore, then they will pay out $21,000 total (original $11k + 10k winnings), regardless of who wins, keeping $1000 for themselves. THAT'S where the money comes from.... right?
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker