View Single Post
  #2  
Old 11-05-07, 10:47 AM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

I definitely wouldn't recommend up, thinking the games will be easier for you to beat. In fact, just the opposite is true. If you are playing with people calling raises with 83s right now, you should be crushing this game before you move up to stakes where people don't call raises with 83s. Think about it. Less bad players = harder to beat game.

ure, you're going to see more variance at the lower limit, you're going to have a harder time putting people on hands, and you're going to take more bad beats..... but no way is that outweighed by the people who will be paying you off with junk and giving you maximum value for your made hands - action you likely won't get at higher limits.

Remember, poker is a long term game. How many hands do you think you have played over those 30 sessions? My guess is it isn't a significant sample size. If you want to get more hands in and pay much less rake, which also makes the games easier to beat - play online. You probably could have played 10 times as many hands as you have in those 30 sessions had you used that same time to play online with a bit of multitabling. Give it some thought.

GL.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker