View Single Post
  #12  
Old 04-14-08, 08:34 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Yeah, mostly.

And I was only referencing the colors because I thought it was easier to quickly look at the graph and identify a color rather than say "Total Winnings" and make you go to the key and see that that's the green line. I figured you'd trust me to use the key correctly.

I thought that the SD winnings and Sklansky Bucks lines were related, and in the long run, should be expected to even out. I thought the SW line was actual showdown results and SB was, well, SB - saying what your EXPECTED return would be based on equity when money goes in before the river - that's why they run mostly parallell, right?

And if that's the case, the difference between them is the variance part. And of course the difference between the Total Winnings and Showdown Winnigns is Non-Showdown winnings. You are saying the same thing, but just differently and using something that's not on the graph:

TW = NSDW +SDW
so
TW - SDW = NSDW

See? Simple algebra. Same thing.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker