View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-16-09, 06:00 PM
Wes Wes is offline
Forum Addict
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,879
Blog Entries: 23
Wes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsWes has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

People play significantly better against it than they did like a year ago. Like a year ago a good shortstacker was making like 3ptbb/100, now its like 2ptbb/100 for the very best. I guess now shortstackers just try to add more tables to increase their hourly.

I never actually did it anywhere but Cake, and that was mostly just from having a stake in some people when they did play 25/50 full stacked that led me to believe that a few regs were total spew monkeys preflop. I did pretty well over a short sample size (aka I run good) making 50k or thereabouts over a few month span sporadically doing it.

Essentially all I did was play around with which got me a lot better at like blind vs. BTN and vice versa shoving. Although I never really delved into the harder math of like what I should be shoving UTG+1 vs. UTG open considering how good/bad other players are at the table, I just had like a rough guess of what it would be. Of course a rough guess is sacrificing a few +EV spots, but I was making a pretty penny at that time full stacking too and improving my game was far more centrally located in improving full stacking to allow me to beat 25/50 full stacked, not expect to make an extra .5ptbb/100 when I was playing really high.

And now I play 2/4 like I always do, so maybe looking into shortstacking again would be better .

Last edited by Wes; 01-16-09 at 08:25 PM.