View Single Post
  #3  
Old 07-26-07, 12:26 AM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

OK, this is taking FOREVER on my computer. Guess I'll have to play some Mahjong while I wait.

OK... From my 2007 Observed Hands database (630k hands) - 99%+ is 1/2 NL through 5/10 NL, and it's all 6 max:

3275 times this situation occured.
1561 times the raise took down the pot right there.

So, that's almost 48% of the time. This number is for higher limits on average than the one from de-coder's database, so I'm not at all surprised to see this play being more successful (many bad players can't fold draws, even when they should). The 6 max vs Full ring could also contribute to the difference.

FYI - it took me 10 minutes and 45 seconds to get the first number and almost 6 minutes to get the second.

I'll run this against my db next, but without a way to filter off the old limit hands, I'm afraid my results will be skewed lower than they really are.

Hmmm... I'm having some issues with my player ID (I get multiple results for Rogue23 and when I use Troll Pie's player ID (that's the one I want to use), I'm being told this situation came up 0 times, which I know is a lie. Maybe it's because of the way "aliases" are set up in PT? I'm not sure.

de-coder - Little help?
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker