Playing within youre bankroll limits

[BrianSwa]

I was thinking about this last night and thought I would throw it up in the air for you guys. Now its been said here about 3 million times about having 300x the BB to play a limit. I disagree with this, let me explain.

I think the 300 bb is only needed if you plan on making one deposit and never depositing again. What if you can deposit again do you really HAVE to play within youre bankroll limits. Lets say some guy deposits $400 and dosent want to play .50/1.00, I have no problem with that guy taking $100 and throwing it in 2/4 which is his favorite limit. As long as this guy knows that he could lose the $100 very easy, what is soooo wrong with this?

I dont think putting a small portion of thier bankroll in a game they arnt bankrolled for is the worst thing to do in the world. Now I dont suggest putting their whole bankroll in a game but a small portion of it, I dont see anything wrong with this. Does anyone agree with this or really disagree? I think it really just comes down to what you want from poker? I play from paycheck to paycheck, I dont have any problem throwing $100 of a $300- $400 bankroll in a 2/4 game. I dont cry about getting outdrawn or bad beats when I play those games because I know im playing about where im not bankrolled for and variance happens.

Discuss....