|
|
|
|
#1
04-17-07, 12:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
If you and Mayhem could each post your rules (or if you could post both versions), I'd like to see what you guys use - and I'm sure others here would as well. I suspect I could tweak them a little more and come up with something that works for me, so I may give this program another shot.
P.S. I'm going to edit the name of this thread, since we are well OT now, but this is useful stuff. |
|
#3
04-17-07, 12:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh yeah.
 I actually remember looking at that and not being very impressed by your rules... If they are good enough for you guys though (and you haven't tweaked them in the last 6 months), then I guess they are good enough for me. |
|
#5
04-17-07, 02:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Better - still though, you're basically only targeting the loose guys, right? I guess that's a good start, but what about the ultra-passive calling stations? Also, what about awarding negative points for the biggest sharks?
Or do you find that to be overkill and just try to find the fish? |
|
#6
04-17-07, 02:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Meh, these work for me. They give me about 12 tables to choose from once i filter the results, then I just get on the best tables out of those's waiting lists, and then just sit at a bunch of already open tables and start playing, switching the newly opened waiting list tables for the worst of my already open tables as they become available.
__________________
I play a game, it's called insincerity. |
|
#9
04-23-07, 05:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
SS purchased, rules imported, running the Aggregator now.
It's been 6 months since my trial, so I have a lot of hands to aggregate. This may take a while. Thanks though. Rules look good at a glance. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
