![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, I agree with your luck sentiments fungus.
I admit I must have ran like GOD when I first started, because I beat NL25 for 5 pt/BB over 5000 for my first month. And this is before I started learning basic strategy ![]() Since then I've never had a 5 ptBB/100 month, I've been in the 3-5 range instead. Excepting this month, where I'm break even at NL25 and ran -4 ptBB/100 over 2K NL50 hands ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would say 55%.
__________________
I can only be Me, 'cause that is who I am! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting question, especially because of all of the related topics it brings up. And if two players play any “significant” (defined how?) number of hands, how far a delta can there really be between the 1 and 100 on your luck scale? I mean in theory, if we should all be at exactly 50 over the long (defined how?) term, right?
I’m going to put myself at 68%. At the tables, I’d say it is only 53%, but I’m going to factor in the convenience factor of me being able to play on my way home from work on any given night, being in a financial position to afford the swings, a patient wife, etc. Note: There’s also a large Quads or better jackpot at my local room. It’s been as high as $20K at one point for a royal, but usually is around $5k or so. If I hit this (maybe even tonight!) I’ll adjust this percentage way up ![]() ![]()
__________________
http://www.vegastripreport.com/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not going to try and quantify it, but holy shit, I was a fucking luckbox at the beginning. Either that, or people really sucked cause I made a fuckton of money (relatively speaking) when I didn't really know what I was doing.
__________________
Get well soon, MCA! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well people sucked alot more than they do now thats for sure. if we could play with our knowledge of the game now 2-3 years ago i know i'd be a millionare, i think alot of ppl here would.
__________________
"Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret" "Rome wasn't built in a day" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ding ding, winner.
at poker I probably am way more lucky than not, but this year it sure feels like hard fucking work is the only thing keeping the bad luck from cleaning me out. That said, every one of us that has the ability and opportunity to belong to this online community and contribute on a regular basis is far more lucky in life than not, so a little unlucky at the pokering still doesn't even it out. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought a little more on this. Someone had mentioned the timing factor of luck and that is huge.
People talk about the 'long run' things working out. Well, sometimes there isn't a 'long run'. Without getting into too much detail (TP will know the hand i am talking about) - i lost a coinflip (my AK vs 10s) that will probably be the biggest coinflip hand i lose, ever. Now, 'long term' - i might win the next 10 hands i get it in with AK vs 10s. But, that will not make up for the coinflip hand i lost in terms of importance. The math itself will work out and i will win and lose my fair share of AK vs 10s hands. But the luck factor comes into play because of the timing of me being 'unlucky' (or not lucky - depending on your point of view). Look at some WSOP champions. They got on hot streaks, lucky streaks if you will, and became world champions. Sure, 'long term' their luck will change and they will lose their fair share of hands. But, so what? They were lucky when they needed to be. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|