And this is what makes Pokerstars "PokerStars"

[Penguinfan]

I will not make this a long drawn out argument, but at what point does skill become a factor in the game then? You mission, should you choose to accept it is to get your chips in the pot with the best hand, correct?

At this point I do not think 10's are the best hand, nor would I even want to risk that many chips on a coin flip. Any measurable amount of skill would enable you to lay down even such a "Monster" as 10's.

Now when you donk off your chips with 10's you deserve to lose to KK every time, forget the flop made me a set as the chips were in prior to that, I guess it's just your garden variety runner-runner straight.

My question is at what point does this game become skill? By the logic above it would be right to call with 3-9 becasue I may have only AK and you are just a 2-1 dog if thats the case.

[Reel Deal]

"I guess if luck wasn't involved I would win everyone of these."

- - Phil Hellmuth

[X-Longshot-X]

You got your money in the right spot there is no doubt, i dont know if u can fault the guy for calling....what was ur table image, i assume they saw u as a rock....but what was ur image at this point....curious

[JDMcNugent7]

dude penguin i dn what your deal is but all your posts lately are only about how u get rivered and how pokerstars cheats only u. u act like there are people programming the river card to make u lose and these programmers sit there and laught at u? I know u said ur a losing player, maybe theres a reason for that, maybe u go on tilt and get all pissed off everytime u get "rivered" cuz u act like its the worst thing in the world.
i cant stand reading these pokerstars is rigged and pokerstars=riverstars no content posts from someone whos been playing and talking poker for what seems to be a very long time.

[Talking Poker]

I dunno. But it's a lot longer than one hand, that's for sure.

Maybe for you. My goal in tourneys is to win the tourney. Please note that those are two very different things. Shove your chips in with the best hand enough and you'll get knocked out eventually. I promise you that.

Agreed. I would have probably folded the TT too, but I definitely don't hate the call as much as you do.

This is where we have to agree to disagree. You think KK should beat TT 100% of the time, and I think it should beat it exactly as much as the math dictates that it should. You seem to think you should never take a bad beat for some reason, and I am smart enough to know they are a part of the game. Suck it up and move on.

Please explain this to me. Seriously, show me how you could ever have the math to call with 93 here.

[Penguinfan]

Based on the woulda, coulda, shoulda math earlier and the fact there was 2780 chips in the pot and he only had to call 1255 he was getting better than 2-1 on his money and 3-9 is only a 2-1 dog against AK, so the call with 3-9 is correct.

What the math leaves out is you should try to put your opponent on some sort of range of hands, while I was playing my big hands very agressive I was not in all that many pots so rags should be out of the question.

KK vs 10 10 all in pre flop is a bad beat and thats the title of this part of the forum, right?

[JDMcNugent7]

u sure sound alot like matusow and that nice little quote u got as ur sig. lately.

[Talking Poker]

In my example, I put the opponent (you) on a range of possible hands. In yiur example, you are saying that you are 100% sure that the opponent had AK, which is obviously incorrect. So I don't see how we are comparing apples to apples here.