![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't hink we can do a points system if there are other players in it. That really messes with the placing. If you got knocked out in 9th place and three non league players finish in 8th, 7th, 6th and then there are league polayers finishing after that then your points are skewed more than they need to be due to the filler players. Not counting the other players in the lineup of finishers would correct this, BUT it would defeat the purpose of having filler players since there would still only be as many league placings as there are league players.
I think if we go with that then it needs to be top finisher in each event (only league players count) gets entry into a final event. I will give this some more thought and type up a full proposal for the way this might wiork later (need something to do at work, right?)
__________________
Your biggest edge in a HORSE tourney is knowing that the game just changed from Razz to 7 Stud. - BB http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/blog.php?u=64 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think we can still use point system but just use league players in it. say we get event with 9 league players and fill it with 11 no league memebers, we just black out the non-league memebers and award places to the league memebers just like it was only them playing. So say i got 2nd and you got 5 and jimmy got 8. It would be just like me getting 1st (longshot) you gettin 2nd and jimmy getting 3rd. That way we award the points like that. its idea what do you think? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
If you are doung that, why bother allowing the non-mebers in in the first place? Why not just play with the three of you, who you at least know will be taking it seriously? I must be missing something here. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|