![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey guys...first post...sorry for being a crasher if you know who i am.
personally, i think NE-4 takes it. eric moulds is out of the game and i don't think the bills can stop tom brady. OAK -3 (+105)...is that a joke? i know they are starting a new qb...but i wouldn't be surprised to see lamont jordan with 130 yards and 2 tds. Easy sweetheart teaser: Colts/Jags OVER 29.5; Broncos -1.5; Bengals PICK; Seahawks -3.5 (on bodog) |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree here. I think oakland beats that line without too much trouble.
__________________
I need 'em for my footsies. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks everyone for the advice. I've looked these over, and I have to tell you, I can't get away from the Bears.
One thing I wasn't clear about is that this is for a Fantasy League of sorts. You start with $10,000 in fake money at the beginning of the year and have to make bets each week. The top 15 teams at the end of the regular season keep betting all the way through the Super Bowl. The top 3 spots pay out very nicely when all is said and done (I forget how many spots get paid - but I need to make the 15 team playoffs before worrying about that). Right now, I'm at a semi-pathetic $11,300, which puts me in 41st place. There were 104 people when we started, but quite a few have gone broke. 15th place has $35,200. The point is, I'm starting to feel the pressure and think it's time to make my move. What I'm leaning towards now is $7300 on the Bears, $3000 on Oakland (Jordan is going to run all over the Jets), and I'm not sure what else. Probably $500 each on Indy and Cincy. We have to bet a minimum of 4 games. The spreads this league uses are the ones in the FRIDAY USA Today. I thought the Sheridan ones reflected those, but it looks like they have moved, so I don't even know. Would feel a lot better if the Bears were getting 6.5 instead of 5.5 though. GL me. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I actually meant to bring this up earlier and in my ramblings just forgot.
The move from 3.5 to 6.5 is insignificant and what a lot of players consider a false move in the line. Normally when a book is getting killed with too much action on one side they move the line to balance out the money a bit better. You can't tell me people are running to the window to bet the Steelers here, no way. The line should be moving the other way. Reguardless if the line is 3.5 or 6.5 Pittsburgh still has to win by one more score than a FG, granted they could win by exactly two FG's but that still puts the game and spread on the line during the last drive reguardless and who bets a game if they know it's coming down to the last drive? What this line move tells me is Vegas wants all the Bears action it can get, and that worries me.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Boy did I get lucky with the Jags game... didn't put a lot on them but what I did was on a +9 line and had they not gone for 2 and made it at the end I would have lost.
__________________
GO GREEN!!! GO WHITE!!! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
So much for my call on the raiders...beat by the jets, sux for randy.
__________________
I need 'em for my footsies. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
hey TP...
Where is this fantasy league located, is it on the internet or what? That sounds like alot of fun and might try to do that next year. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|