The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 11-03-06, 06:58 PM
eejit101's Avatar
eejit101 eejit101 is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 5,168
eejit101 has between 100 and 249 Rep Pointseejit101 has between 100 and 249 Rep Pointseejit101 has between 100 and 249 Rep Points
Default

I dont know Jamie Gold.
Ive never seen him play.
I dont know this crispin bloke.
Ive heard jamie gold is a dumbass.

so, my take on this, please correct me if im wrong.


1. Gold gets given a $10k buyin from bodog, for being a good player.
2. Gold accepts.
3. Gold meets crispin.
4. Crispin is broke.
5. Crispin harasses gold.
6. Crispins gets some not famous people who were famous for 5 mins to play for Bodog.
7. Bodog wont give crispin his $10k entry.
8. Gold feels sorry and says ill share some profits.
9. Gold gets AA every hand and wins.
10. Crispin thinks hes won $6million.





This case to me is defined by 2 key points if its under UK contract/paper law.

1. Did gold sign anything to say he would give Crispin half.
2. Were their witnesses that hears him say and agree to "gold giving crispin half".


Splitting profits and donating some profits is differnt. I won $65k. If before this i said to TP ill donate some to a TP freeroll if i win id donate say $500. TP then thinks were having a $37.5k freeroll. No question, in a court of law, i win hands down.

I dont get what kind of case this crispin has.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com