|
|
|
|
#1
04-13-07, 07:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
May be some hope (online gambling law)
__________________
I like to get my money in when behind, that way I cant get drawn out 
|
|
#2
04-13-07, 07:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good stuff.
I was waitng for the WTO ruling and then forgot all about it. |
|
#3
04-14-07, 07:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
no poker carve out all or none says frank
__________________
I like to get my money in when behind, that way I cant get drawn out
|
|
#4
04-14-07, 11:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very interesting:
Works for me. |
|
#5
04-23-07, 07:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
270 days almost here and heres the latest
__________________
I like to get my money in when behind, that way I cant get drawn out
|
|
#7
04-24-07, 12:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Frank said "I am not going to draw a distinction between poker and blackjack," said Frank.
Despite the fact that I philosophically agree with his stand, he is missing the point. The sticking point here is (and always has been) sports betting. The NFL, NHL, NBA, MLB and the NCAA are all going to fall into lockstep behind any legislation that restricts their boogeyman.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind." Old Norse adage |
|
#8
04-24-07, 05:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
after 270 days with no guidlines set is it null and void?
__________________
I like to get my money in when behind, that way I cant get drawn out
|
|
#9
04-24-07, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sounds nice, but no... where in the world did you hear that?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
