2.5xBB as standard PFR?

[Reel Deal]

I can understand why it would be incorrect late in a tourney but, out of curiosity, why do you feel it's incorrect for cash games? Mainly b/c you're inviting too many hands to come along?

[lightfungus]

Frankly, I think that outplaying your opponent postflop like Negreanu does is something only achievable in live play at a high percent success rate. Secondly, I can see how that raise is powerful if used by a powerful player, but only in the appropriate situation. For example, I think if the average raise is, like they said 3-4 times the BB, then it's fine and you would adjust accordingly to the average raise. In fact, if I ever play live again I would like to give this a shot.

In retrospect, I just regurgitated what TP said in a lame way.

[Boobie Lover]

One player who destroyed the 10/20 NL game on Party opened regularly for 2.5BBx (sameolus on 2+2). Of course, he played some ridiculous laggy style (like 39/29) so that was probably in a way to negate his preflop disadvantage that he will encounter. So, there probably is a way to make opening for this small to work, but you have to be so exceptionally better than your opponents postflop that it is doubtful many people in the world can do it.

In my tournament game, I just try to find what is the smallest amount preflop that will routinely steal the blinds. If the blinds are really weak, I'll *shock* min raise to take away their blinds.

[Zybomb]

Because it does not accomplish what a raise is intended to accomplish... thin the field.

In a cash game your open should be the table standard. Sometimes thats $20-$30 at a $1/$2 Table, sometimes it's $7.

In the 5/5 Game I regularlly play the average open varies between $30-$50 typically. Thats 6-10 BBs

In Vegas at the 2/5 Tables, the opens were generally $25-$30, with some tables being in the $35-50 range.

Never however, is raising 2.5 BBs in a cash game standard and never will it accomplish what you intend it to, since all hands which would come in for a limp will come in for this raise and the blinds will also call with a very wide range of hands if a few players are in, since its not much more.

Never less than 3.5BB's, I personally wont come in for less than 4

Late in a tourny I like the 2.5 BB approach IF it works like TP said.

[Talking Poker]

Yes. It's barely different that a min raise, which IMO, is worse than limping.

[Kurn]

This I don't get. In effect, if you're in position with, say QJs, and you would limp after limpers anyway because you believe you can outplay them in a multiway pot, what's wrong with doubling the bet and in effect say "lets all play, but lets double the stakes"? All the minraise does is to make the bets on later streets bigger. If you're better than they are, why is this bad?

[Talking Poker]

So, you are raising QJs for value, then? In other words, you think it's the best hand right now? Because if you don't, then you are basically building a pot with the intention of "stealing" it after the flop - and you can do that with any two cards.... so why do it with QJs and not KT or 44 or 72? Or are you just gambling, because you have a hand that can hit some flops (but won't won't be the best hand most of the time)?

Not only that, but with your min raise, you have opened the door for any of the limpers and certainly the blinds to reraise and push you off your hand, so you'll be throwing away twice as much money (I assume you'll fold to a real raise) as you needed to.

IMO, if you want to play for "double the stakes," move up in limits.

[Kurn]

OK, I see your reasoning. I was again parroting Sklansky's point from the NLHE book. As for pushing people off their hands later, I'd rather make a normal raise here for that purpose.

Again, this is still me thinking like a limit player with position and positive equity.