![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I cant think of one reason WHY NOT.....
seriously I hate that guy. Did you catch him this time around on PAD! Just the first 3 minutes will show you what I mean. His totally rehearsed and assanine comments.......... douche or tool or schmuck Take you pick. Just ask Lingren. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What surprises me most about this show is how passive everybody is. I don't know that I've seen that many 5way BB pots since $0.10 poker... Lots of min-raising too...
Anyone else find that weird from these guys? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's one thing to mix up your play a little bit, but these guy s are ridiculously passive, limping in with anything that resmebles a good starting hand... I ifind it strange, yes.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do you think some of the groups have agreed to some sort of chop/deal? I know they are putting up the 20K (supposedly). But I wonder if they decided to chop it between say the last 3. That would explain the passive play early (not wanting to be one of the first who bust). Probably nothing to it, but it makes you wonder when you see players like Antonius, and even Gus 'anyhand' Hansen playing so passively/cautiously.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No way. The money is relatively insignificant to them. They just want to stick around to get more tv time.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have to say - I think this week's match was quite possibly the best one I've seen so far. Sure, there were some donkey-ish plays (like JT's check on the river with the boat - but at least she realized after that it was horribly wrong) but there was lots of good action and some sick pseudo-comebacks.
What this table lacked it witty banter I think it made up for in watchable, enjoyable poker. |
![]() |
|
|