full tilt question (plus some Sixth Sense discussion)

[PShabi]

Mayhem has a set that work good. He sent me the .txt file and that was it. I'd use it at higher levels. It works well at NL200, but there's close to 50 tables running at times. I'd think that at the higher levels, game/seat selection would be even more important. Better competition, less fish, less games.

I like every edge I can get, and this is just another one.

[melioris]

I use 6th sense as well, for game selection at $100 and $200NL. I find it remarkably helpful, esp when you are changing tables in teh middle of a session. As for the rules, I used mayhems for a bit, and they were good, but then I just found and wrote my own really easily. I would be happy to share if anyone wants them, but it is so easy to tweak your rules for your own style of play using that program that really everyone can find make their own rules.

[Talking Poker]

If you and Mayhem could each post your rules (or if you could post both versions), I'd like to see what you guys use - and I'm sure others here would as well. I suspect I could tweak them a little more and come up with something that works for me, so I may give this program another shot.

P.S. I'm going to edit the name of this thread, since we are well OT now, but this is useful stuff.

[MAYHEM45]

[Talking Poker]

Oh yeah.

I actually remember looking at that and not being very impressed by your rules... If they are good enough for you guys though (and you haven't tweaked them in the last 6 months), then I guess they are good enough for me.

[MAYHEM45]

Shit, those rules suck. Ive tweaked them since then. Hold on.

[Talking Poker]

Better - still though, you're basically only targeting the loose guys, right? I guess that's a good start, but what about the ultra-passive calling stations? Also, what about awarding negative points for the biggest sharks?

Or do you find that to be overkill and just try to find the fish?