|
|
|
|
#1
07-10-07, 04:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
If you check/called the flop, you very easily could have taken this from me on the turn. Depends how expensive it got and how much was already in the pot.... but I'm thinking an all in check raise would have done the trick.... unless of course I checked behind and then shoved over your river bet, which you would have had to call.
Then again, had we played it like that, the cards would have been different anyway, what with the continuous shuffke and all. Shame you didn't wait one more split second before calling my shove. 
|
|
#2
07-10-07, 04:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is why I raised the flop -- although, I'll call and then lead the turn a lot also... but what I was trying to say in my original post (unclearly) was that WITH position, I liked a smooth call followed by a turn raise all-in (assuming you bet again OOP) a lot
Oh yea and ...    @#$%#@!%#@%#!$!$!#@$#$@!%%$%!@#$
__________________
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." |
|
#4
07-10-07, 01:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Really? I'll call that too a good percentage of the time - always against bad opponents, and rarely against opponents who I think are capable of getting off an overpair. I guezz Zy gives me no respect.
Anyway, where do you draw the line for calling 3 bets OOP then? Roughly... |
|
#5
07-10-07, 01:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would it be generally -EV value if it was limit? Implied odds in NL would make this very callable in the right situation (as you have said)
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
|
#6
07-10-07, 01:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It would be much lower EV in limit than in NL, since the implied odds are a fraction as much as they are in NL.
|
|
#8
07-14-07, 12:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please explain. I understood that the implied odds are in the additional money that can be won if you hit your set. How do you factor in 3 bet frequency?
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
