|
|
|
|
#2
07-10-07, 02:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Really? I'll call that too a good percentage of the time - always against bad opponents, and rarely against opponents who I think are capable of getting off an overpair. I guezz Zy gives me no respect.
Anyway, where do you draw the line for calling 3 bets OOP then? Roughly... |
|
#3
07-10-07, 02:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would it be generally -EV value if it was limit? Implied odds in NL would make this very callable in the right situation (as you have said)
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
|
#4
07-10-07, 02:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It would be much lower EV in limit than in NL, since the implied odds are a fraction as much as they are in NL.
|
|
#6
07-14-07, 01:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please explain. I understood that the implied odds are in the additional money that can be won if you hit your set. How do you factor in 3 bet frequency?
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
|
#7
07-14-07, 01:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If he is 3betting alot he is doing so with much more than high pocket pairs. The implied odds come from getting his whole stack in the middle which wont happen often if his 3betting range is wide, as he wont be connecting with many flops with which he will comfortably get his whole stack in postflop.
__________________
I play a game, it's called insincerity. |
|
#8
07-14-07, 03:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And "getting his whole stack in" is VERY difficult to do in limit.
Implied odds in NL >>> Implied odds in limit. They are a lot easier to calculate in limit though. |
|
#9
07-14-07, 09:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does that mean implied odds realy (at least in part) with wanting him to have an over pair to the board?
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
