The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-07, 01:27 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

I understand your point - believe me, I do. But I think you are missing my points:

1. The people you are describing are cheating on their taxes already if they aren't reporting their poker income (and losses) properly.

2. Legalizing online gambling and the tax codes related to gambling are two very different things. Yes, they both have gambling in common, but that's it. Don't hate online gambling because it won't be as easy to cheat on your taxes any more. It is what it is. Hate the tax laws (which are horribly out of date - we all agree) and attack those separately. There is no chicken/egg relationship here. In fact, the tax laws ALREADY suck (for the very few of us who apparently don't cheat on our taxes and report all of our wins and losses), regardless of the legality of online gambling, so call you congressman and get him to introduce a bill to change those now.

They are two different things, and you are insisting on lumping them together. You're a math guys. Basically, this is what you are saying:

(Illegal online gambling + shitty tax laws) > (Legal online gambling + shitty tax laws)

SURELY you can see if the "shitty tax laws" are what you hate about the above equation, they cancel out on both sides and have nothing to do with the legality of online gambling:

(Illegal online gambling + shitty tax laws) > (Legal online gambling + shitty tax laws)

So that leaves us with you saying:

(Illegal online gambling) > (Legal online gambling)

And that's where we disagree. Me - I want it legalized. I'll worry about everyone else's taxes a couple of years (minimum) after online gambling is legalized.

The day that Party Poker has your SSN and is sending giant reports of all of your wins and losses to the IRS is far, far, far down the road. In fact, I would guess that day will never come. You will likely get 1099G'd for your either your total income over the year, or more likely, you'll get hit with individual 1099Gs for big tourney wins only - just like happens in B&M casinos now.

You talk about the UIGEA being a toothless tiger, despite the bite it's had on numerous poker sites, Neteller, etc, etc, etc. Meanwhile, you seem to be much more afraid of an invisible, sleeping tiger.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #2  
Old 07-20-07, 02:52 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default OK, the other post wasn't my last word.

In a way, this discussion is futile. Legal is better than illegal. But, you and I clearly have a different philosophical perspective on the morality of complying with certain laws, which seems to be the basis for the friction we're having on this topic. And that's cool. As Mark Twain said "differences of opinion are what make horse races."

<dreaming of a 21st century equivalent to the burning of the HMS Gaspee>
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
  #3  
Old 07-20-07, 03:06 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Don't get me wrong - I think the gambling related tax laws are ridiculous. I guess what it boils down to is your "main point:"

I think online poker (and more specifically, the amount of money I take home from it at the end of the year) will be better off if it's legalized and regulated. You don't. And that's fine. It's a difference of opinion.

All I'm saying is that there are better way for you to hate/protest/FIX the gambling tax laws than to be Mr. Anti-PPA and Mr. Anti-Legalizing online gamble.

Edit: Also, I hope you realize that pleading ignorance DOES NOT WORK when it comes to tax evasion. THAT is one thing that is very clear in our tax laws.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #4  
Old 07-20-07, 03:59 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default

While the IRS can be real hard-ass about some things, on others they can be remarkably reasonable. I think this is one of the situations where they will be reasonable.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com