![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree completly TP, I'm just saying that Raymer was the agressor in most coin flips and yes he got/stayed lucky to win them. Moneymaker CALLED from behind and caught up, big difference in my opinion. That hand against Brenes just sticks out in my mind, I would love to hear Chris explain that one, especially after he commented about knowing he was in big trouble during the actual play of the hand. If he knew he was in big trouble then that had to mean he had 2 outs at best and put the majority of his stack at risk knowing this, horrible play and caught a 2-outer, hard to defend. Being the agressor with the cards Raymer did is much different than calling with the cards Moneymaker did.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also Raymer had about 15 million in chips so he could do pretty much anything he wanted to do.
The most Moneymaker or Farha had at 1 time was 4 mill and change. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly, Raymer did what he was supposed to do with his big stack. They also had him do this 'running commentary' thing on his win like a couple months ago.
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
He actually talks about this hand in his book. I will post it later.
|
![]() |
|
|