|
|
|
|
#1
07-17-05, 07:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Theres also 3 extras (the last 3 who responded)
I agree with Aeq, seniority should come into play, -- if it comes down to it, drewjax should definately get a spot over someone with < 5 posts |
|
#3
07-17-05, 07:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Missed page two of the thread all together....
|
|
#6
07-17-05, 09:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wit so much drama in the LBC,
It's kinda hard being Snoop D-O-Double-G...
__________________
|
|
#7
07-17-05, 10:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've said I was in already
|
|
#9
07-19-05, 01:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, here's how this is going to work:
If we get exactly 32 participants (we won't), yeah for us! If we have LESS than 32, some people will get byes into Round 2. If we have MORE than 32, some people will have to play in a preliminary round to see who moves on to Round 1. I will determine how it all shakes out and who falls where. This will be mostly based on post count, but not entirely. Overall post quality (purely subjective, as seen by me) will also come into play. Not to name names, but yes, while kkirk has loads more posts than Kurn, for example, I don't think there is a single member of this forum who would disagree with me when I say Kurn has contributed more. So if it came down to those two (it won't, but hypothetically), kkirk would have to play in the preliminary round (or Kurn would get the bye, as the case may be). I've just started the process of finding us a host for this tourney. I'm going to make sure the prize pool is at least $100, plus probably some other goodies. I'm hoping one of the poker sites will pony up some cash for our business, but if not, I will. Right now, let's just keep this list going so we can have everything ready to go by August 1st. Oh, one other thing.... I'll write up all the details later, but right now, I'm thinking we'll give each pair 3-4 days to play their match. If they can't come up with a time that's good for both of them, we'll have to deal with it. In most cases, whichever guy wasn't able to play (or disappeared completely, which I supect will happen) will forfeit. I guess we'll handle it on a case by case basis. Worst case scenario, we'll vote to see who moves on. By the time we get to the Round of 8, if not sooner, I doubt this will be a problem any more. This is going to be WAY cool. There's still some big names missing from the list though. Come on, people - step up! |
|
#10
07-19-05, 02:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have we decided if this is a 2 out 3 series per round or 1 wins it?
Also have we decided if its double elimination or single? Also GREAT idea about post quality TP. That has to be considered PS: Ive done these brackets for several years (college beer pong tournaments lol) so if u need any help with breaking down the extra matches/byes, lemme know Im a wiz by now 
|
|
#13
07-19-05, 12:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's going to be single elimination. For simplicity sake, I think we should go with one round matches, at least in the earlier rounds... but if you guys would rather do best of 3, we can do that too... I just figure it going to be enough trouble getting people to coordinate their schedules for one match, let alone 2 or 3... Then again, they might not take that long. I'm ok with doing this either way. What do you all think?
|
|
#14
07-19-05, 12:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I vote for 2/3 just because it reduces the luck factor.
__________________
|
|
#15
07-19-05, 12:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the best of three as well. We do have all month to get this done. Most would play all three at once, I would think instead of trying to organize 2-3 seperate times.
|
|
#16
07-19-05, 12:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with you guys. Unless anyone strongly objects and thinks a single match is the way to go, we'll do best of 3...
I'm still waiting to hear back from the poker sites. The clock is ticking. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
