|
|
|
|
#1
07-19-05, 04:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
If nobody buys a certain player then that player owns himself for free. This rarely happens in a golf outing as you can pick up players for the minimum bid (which sometimes there is not one) at the last minute.
In a game such as this it would be nuts not to own a player for 1.00 as anyone may win this thing.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#2
07-19-05, 04:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lou,
We posted at nearly the same time, I have seen it done that way in a pool tournament as well. I have not in a golf outing, though I don't see why it couldn't be.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#3
07-19-05, 04:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yea, I see that we overcrossed... just seems unfair to me. Golf outing is one thing... everyone knows each other, all friends (I hope - LOL), this is different. Much more like a pool hall situation.
__________________
|
|
#4
07-19-05, 04:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I definitely don't agree w/ this.
The calcutta is open to those people who want to participate. If someone doesn't want to participate, they don't an interest in the (calcutta) prizepool. If there are players betting on others, and then there are a few new members who aren't bet on, they shouldn't get themselves for free. They invested no money into the calcutta pool, and IMO, they aren't deserving of everyone else's money. It's a windfall. Like I said, I THINK the best option is the "player block" bid situation. What do other people think about this? Anyone else?
__________________
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
