![]() |
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did anyone ever take a look at these and decide which looks best?
I'm going to have to do this myself, aren't I? Fine. Jerks.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I still want to. Just haven't had the time yet.
__________________
Get well soon, MCA! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was excited about it when I first read about it and posted, but like pshab said in the post her referenced, looking at the numbers on playerview or another hud is usually enough.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like the second set.
Most TAGs I've experienced in 6-max are 28/12, so I'd prefer <30/>10 (2nd set) rather than <25/>15 (first set). The third set doesn't consider PFR and I don't think river aggression is an overly useful stat for classifying TAG/LAG/LP, etc. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I finally got around to looking at it.
I have to agree with SJAY's post above. The second set is the best. I'd actually alter my TAG stats to be <30VPIP and >13% PFR. I don't see how you can make any ratings without taking PFR into account, so throw #3 out right away.
__________________
Get well soon, MCA! |
![]() |
|
|