|
|
|
|
#1
11-10-04, 08:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Very good question.
Poker today is different than poker was 3 years ago. And of course, the argument of who is the "best" will never be answered. With that said though, I believe the most recent results are the most valid. I know variance and the sheer number of players entering tournaments have contributed to Hellmuth and Seidel being winless this year, as you've mentioned. But so too has the style of play. Those that have been able to adjust their play like the Juandas, Negraneus and Hansons are seemingly having wild success this year. It will be interesting to see if their success holds up over time. |
|
#2
11-10-04, 10:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly! The game of poker is all about adjusting yourself to the situation. Players who have played for years the same way and come out on top got a rude awakening a few years ago when poker changed, and they were forced to alter (or attempt to alter) their style to suit the new poker world.
Not only tourney to tourney, but hand to hand. Every hand is an entirely different game, and that's how people win tournaments. IMHO |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
