![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Missing? Um, how about names that have no business being on that list either.
That's really something. I bet Raymer is pretty flattered to be on the list the Chan and Bruson can't even make. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, keep in mind this is the top 'legends' list, not just top players. After all, would you put Binion on a top 10 players list? Personally though, given the nature of this list I would've put Harrington on there, winning a Main Event and then FTing the 2 that really put it in the limelight is really an achievement.
My list would go something like this: 1. Doyle 2. Slim 3. Binion 4. Ungar 5. Moss 6. Pearson 7. Hellmuth 8. Harrington 9. Annie Duke <- Gotta give a little love to the ladies, plus she totally punked Hellmuth ![]() 10. Chan/Men The Master/Ivey Honorable Mention to Raymer. Beat a big field, then went deep against a HUGE field, and with nothing but class. Note: Edited to avoid postwhoring charges. ![]()
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. Last edited by Tony Cheval; 11-17-05 at 02:00 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While very slick, I can’t imagine this is going to be cost effective for them. While I’m happy to read their publication, it’s not going to get me to deposit. Since I enjoy following the industry side as well as playing, the piece I enjoyed most was the history of the site/founders. It sounds like their life ambition was to do anything but have a real job – before starting the site, they were professional card counters.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess it all depends on how they define legend. I hope it is some weird definition that I haven't heard of cause a few of those aren't legends in anyone's mind but their own.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Exactly, I based mine on 'does ANYBODY outside of the pro poker circles know who this is', which I think is a fair definition of legend.
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. |
![]() |
|
|