![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() according to TP who was there it was alot longer then 5 minutes think he said like 15 or 20 minutes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I didn't see it, but that's what I heard from someone who did. I think he said 10-15...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thats horrible, how do take 10-15 minutes to make that call? the hand wasnt even that great, it wasnt a life or death situation there is absolutely no reason one could take that much time
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
deffinantly Johnny Chan...if he played more tournys he would be SO AMAZING
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
By far, Dave "the devilfish" ulliot. He plays with any hand and wins with any hand. He could go all-in with AA or 2,7, offsuite. Thats my kind of poker player
__________________
I'm Ron Burgundy saying, go F--- yourself San Diego |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This guy Hawt cashes in tournaments more than all the bots at Party combined, but, besides him, I would have to go with Raymer. Even before he won the WSOP he was a strong and sound player, and always gave out solid advice on the 2+2 forums, it seems like the man lives for huge fields. I don't know how his cash game is, but for strictly tournaments he is up there along with Phil Hellmuth. Say what you will about Phil but he gets his shit done and cashes even if he doesn't "win".
__________________
-Hawt Sincerity is everything. And once you learn how to fake that, you've got it made. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've played with DevilFish. He's good, but I don't tihnk he's the best. Just my opinion...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bet he was fun to play with, a colorful character no?
|
![]() |
|
|