The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-04, 11:04 PM
DaTruPoker DaTruPoker is offline
Donkey
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 50
DaTruPoker has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

Interestingly enough I just finished Sklanskys Tournament for advanced players. The gap conecept is one of, if not his main point in the book. i agree with it 100% in tourneys. However, in cash games I will often limp with hands I would raise with in tourneys, as in side games my goal is to win large pots and in tourneys just to take down the pot ASAP. EX: In a low limit NL game(25-50 buy in) I will NEVEr raise with a low-mid(about 10s) PP. I will try to either hit a set or have it all be undercards and win a large pot. however, later in a tourney I will raise with almost any hand. The biggest improvement I recevied from reading his book is that he suggests raising based almost entirely on position, and not cards. Reason: Raising with 2-7 OS is obviously easy to get away from if someone comes over the top. However, what if you hold kq, aj, a10 etc etc?? you can get in much more trouble this way. In tourneys I raise with ANY 2 cards if i have a decent stack, am at least within 3 seats of the button, and no one has entered the pot in front of me. The largest perk of this is that you will get paid off immenslet when you do hold a large hand. I strugge myself when I raise with decent hands and someone comes over the top. however, I have had plays with AJ and someone moves in after I raise it with my AJ and I call and he has a K 5 or Q 9 thinking that I am alot weaker than I am. So I must also adjust my game to my table image. People not giving me enough credit for a hand. But I play poker to be aggressive in tourneys, thats the fun of it, aint it?

just my tourney strategy.
__________________
"I just started seeing ads for Wonderbras, is that really the problem in this country? Men not paying enough attention to Women's breasts?" -Hugh Grant
  #2  
Old 11-19-04, 02:41 AM
drewjax's Avatar
drewjax drewjax is offline
CELTICS BACK TO BACK BITCHES
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,584
drewjax has between 250 and 499 Rep Pointsdrewjax has between 250 and 499 Rep Pointsdrewjax has between 250 and 499 Rep Pointsdrewjax has between 250 and 499 Rep Pointsdrewjax has between 250 and 499 Rep Points
Default

As a very general obervation/thought, does it make sense that acting late is more important pre-flop, and acting early is beneficial post-flop??
  #3  
Old 11-19-04, 11:20 AM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Acting late is always beneficial. Always.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com