![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
ouch, so tough, some parts of poker is just luck.
__________________
"Know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em" Fill out some surveys and get paid. Made $206 so far! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My first thought would've been to put him all in earlier, but looking at it he probably would have called anything and you got beat on a pretty good play. It baffles me why he'd call your raise while he had queens showing. Tough luck.
__________________
"When I cut my finger, that's a tragedy. When you fall down a manhole and die, that's a comedy." -- Mel Brooks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the limits were 6K/12K so I was betting and such to put him allin, he had about 50K left... its not like NL HE where you can just go allin lmao. I agree when he had the Qs showing and I raised him, he has to figure he is beat.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He was pot comitted, and simply was hoping his queens were good, when he re-raised you....
Each card on each street you say was an x. Well, If it's only an x (under queen) than why wouldn't he stay? He's making a stand is all. (Probably a bit early to make a stand but that was what he was doing). I really don't think he was looking for that 3rd queen on the river (Although he wasn't complaining). I also think you put alot more of your stack in then a pair of kings could justify. This is 7-card stud.... you have to worry about flush, straight but if neither of those are visible, could you beat 2 pair? That is entirely possible, and definitely not unlikely.
__________________
3rd Grade Reading Level! |
![]() |
|
|