|
|
|
|
#1
11-24-04, 05:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I think I would be pot commited if I feel my hand has a chance to win, and at least over 2/3 of my stacks is in.
__________________
"Know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em" Fill out some surveys and get paid. Made $206 so far! |
|
#2
11-24-04, 07:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some good points here.
I think many people force themselves into pot-comitted situations, even when it's not blind related. If you're going to make a raise at a pot and it's more than 1/3 your stack, you have to realize that a re-raise will pot comitt you. If I have 9000, raise the blinds which are 500/1000 to 3000 and get re-raised to 6000, it's either all-in or fold here. There are players who will simply call and then become pot comitted post-flop if they've even marginally hit their hands since the pot odds will dictate the call. It's a fine line to balance between risk of ruin, pot odds and being pot committed in the late stages of NL tournament play. |
|
#4
11-25-04, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
to me theres no such thing as pot commit... if i'm on the river and the pot is huge and i KNOW i'm beat, i will only call if the bet is tiny and i want to see what my opponent's exact hand is. other than that... i dont think its ever acceptable to call for commitment.
-JB |
|
#5
11-26-04, 02:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I must be a shit player coz i sometimes feel pot commited when i have very few chips left to pull out and stand a chance in the tourny.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
