|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
06-15-06, 01:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
In that specific situation I'd consider folding KK. I might even actually fold KK. On the other hand I have never folded KK preflop and I'd have to tune out Dan Harrington saying he doesn't believe there's anyone in the world smart enough to be correct in folding KK preflop.
|
|
#2
06-15-06, 02:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ive folded KK exactly once preflop (funny that it was at a lower limit too)
I wound up being correct in doing so this time, but not to remain results oriented, Id like to present to the situation to you and see if you think in the longrun this laydown is incorrect. Heres the thread
__________________
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." |
|
#3
06-15-06, 03:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I stand by everything I wrote in that thread at a time.
I do some damn good analysis sometimes. 
|
|
#4
06-15-06, 02:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think I could tune that out pretty easily given the example above. There is exactly ONE (reasonable - assuming not a complete bluff) hand that I can beat, and that's a seriously overplayed QQ. I suppose you could make a case for a seriously overplayed AK as well, but with me holding two Kings, that's not likely.
Anyway, factor in the liklihood of all the hands he could be holding - and even throw in 10% for a pur bluee with 2 undercards - and the math will tell you this is a pretty easy fold. And even if it comes out marginally +EV (it won't), I'd still fold. You don't win the WSOP by taking hundreds of coinflips. You win it be being patient and CALLING your money all in as a much bigger favorite than that (obviously pushing all in is different). |
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
