The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-04, 09:38 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

I like your breakdown, but you didn't follo wit all the way through, and you are forgetting (failing to mention) one very significant factor:

You aren't allowed to "cash out" when you win. You have to keep on playing. Sure, a decent player will get to play for a while, and may move quit far up the ladder, but only 4 players are actually able to cash out. Yes, they get to cash out quite a bit of money, but everyone else goes home with nothing (Exception: the three people earlier on the chart who won $30 and $35).

So, let's look at the loser side of this, just for kicks... and we'll assume everyone starts at the $11 level (they won't, but we'll just talk in terms of an $11 entry fee)...

Ok, I started typing this all up, but it's freaking complicated With the players looping back to various steps, it's really hard to figure out how many people need to lose before starting a final table.

I guess the easiest way to think about it (although not exact) is that there is $20,000 in the prize pool. With a $10 entry fee to get things started, it's going to take 2000 players to fund that final table (this is not counting Party's cut along the way). And only 4 players win.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #2  
Old 12-06-04, 09:50 PM
eddo31 eddo31 is offline
Shark
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: central MA / Cincinnati
Posts: 751
eddo31 has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

i believe that this is basically the same structure that foxwoods used for their ACT I, II and III satellites for the WPT event there. it seems to give a lot of play, especially because you get to repeat levels if you do well enough.

i havent done the math behind it, but i would assume that party makes out like bandits in this situation. is there really any motivation for them to add this unless they can make a significant profit margin from it?
  #3  
Old 12-06-04, 10:00 PM
Defendant Defendant is offline
Rock
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 464
Defendant has between 50 and 99 Rep Points
Default

Big time, eddo. Online poker is HIGHLY competitive, and anything to make your site stand out above the rest is a good thing, even if you only make marginal profit off of it. Something like this is more a customer draw thing than a cashcow IMO.

Defendant
  #4  
Old 12-06-04, 10:20 PM
eddo31 eddo31 is offline
Shark
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: central MA / Cincinnati
Posts: 751
eddo31 has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

i just am not sure that party needs to try and out-promote the other players in online poker. they are the microsoft here, and they only need to change when enough people really get pissed about their policies and fees. yes, there is other competition for the online poker players to go to, but no one else is really even close to party for game selection, number of players, etc. stars may have the better tourneys, but as a whole party just blows everyone else away.

i am sure that they dont really approach their business this way, as it is usually good to grow your customer base, but i dont think their motives necessarily have to be geared towards giving the customers a better deal. if they wanted to do that, the only way for most online players to even notice the difference would be to offer a huge deposit bonus. i dont think that most casual players are using pokertracker to calculate their rake, and that is what this type of tourney would affect. people will be intrigued with the idea of winning 9k off of a $12 buyin, and that is enough incentive for most players without there being a reduction in effective rake.
  #5  
Old 12-06-04, 10:44 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

It's all about the money. Party still doesn't even have decent (or even accurate!) stats. It drives me crazy.

Just look at all the numbers on the ladder after the "+" - Yeah, I think they are going to do just fine with this...
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #6  
Old 12-07-04, 12:39 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

Marketing genius's they are, no doubt about that. Sure they are taking more than the standard rake here, but nobody notices, or nobody cares.


TP, it's $11+1 so 1819 start any given set of steps and 4 people actually cash out, when you look at it like that it seems horrible, huh?
But I can't help myself.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
  #7  
Old 12-07-04, 12:52 PM
PShabi PShabi is offline
MC Adam Yauch
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,947
PShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep Points
Default I'm the next guinea pig

Gonna have to give this a try tonight. Should be fun. I'll let you know how I made out?

Penguin,

Are the players playing differently in these types of tourneys?

Oh, and by the way. Yeah, it would suck to finish fifth in the final step but how can you complain at a chance to win that much money with a $12 buyin and only 20 people to beat?

When I make it to Step 5, I'll probably have some mad butterflies! Can't wait.


  #8  
Old 12-07-04, 01:03 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

No, the play of the game seems the same, though you have to adjust for the extra players and the fact that you will be playing 5 or 6 handed for a while, something that I find a bit tougher, especially since you go from 5 handed back to 10 handed when the tables combine. Also when you get to the final table (so to speak) you will be playing a regular 10 player SNG but with blinds at the level they have increased to and varying amount of chips, seems you better have at least doubled up at your first table to really have any use of decent strategy. You don't want to be in a situation where you have to double up and still have 8 opponents. If your a good SNG player and can adjust to these minor/major changes you may hit the jackpot.

I was a bit upset with myself in the second game I played yesterday because I was the chip leader with 6 players left and busted out 6th. Kept getting the short stacks pushing in when I was in the blind and it didn't cost me that much to call and I always had decent hand AQs, JJ, AKo, etc... and they kept catching with A/rag. In a game like this when there is only 20K in chips total it hurts to lose 700 or 800 even if your the leader and thats just what happened to me. If I would have won one of those hands where I was a racing favorite I think I would have been OK, but as it is I will be at level 1 in a few minutes.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
  #9  
Old 12-07-04, 01:54 PM
PShabi PShabi is offline
MC Adam Yauch
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,947
PShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep PointsPShabi has between 2500 and 2999 Rep Points
Default

Shouldn't have any problem with the shorthanded to tenhanded aspect because I usually play 20 man SNGs so I'm used to it.

two more questions (don't bitch, Tp's paying you ):

If I'm down to three men, there's really no reason to win at one of the lower stages. I could just lose and still advance right? Seems like it.

Also, let's say I play and win up through STep 3. Am I required to play step 4 right then or is there another step 4 that I can enter later, or maybe the next day?

Can't necessarily devote that much time at once to poker. Baby might take a shit or something.
  #10  
Old 12-07-04, 02:18 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

Top 4 advance reguardless of finishing position.

You can play the following steps anytime you like. They just put a voucher in your account for the next game and when you open a step 2 table you have the option to use the voucher or buy-in with cash.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com