|
|
|
|
#1
08-25-06, 12:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, I think turning $0 into $6 million instead of $12 million is a pretty sweet deal.
But I am still leaning towards this guy being an eejit. So, he promised 10% to Chan too, eh? That must have been some serious "consulting." I mean, what could he have possibly told him that would make THAT much difference??? |
|
#3
08-25-06, 08:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm pretty sure I had read it over at that big place in one of the many Gold threads. I'll take a look and see if I can find it again.
|
|
#4
08-25-06, 12:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was mentioned in at 2+2. I think I also read it in another thread at 2+2 that was a bit more corroborative but can't find it now.
There was another interesting post in that thread about Stephen Colbert and Jamie Gold. You be the judge: |
|
#5
08-30-06, 10:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Newer thread at 2+2 has a supposedly reputable source claiming the 10% Johnny Chan dealie-o never happened now. Grr. Stupid internets and all their vicious rumours. Lies! They're all lies I tell ya!!!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
