![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
6-handed has one added benefit: top 2 pay, out of 6 people, thats 33%. Top 3 out of 10 people is only 30%. That means, more spots pay out.
Just something else to consider. Defendant Edit: WEEE 200 posts!!! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Although playing tight may pay off there, if you play really good players at short handed play, those guys can probably steal a lot of hands. I just don't think it's the right way to play in the long term for short handed tables. I think you need to be a lot more aggressive and bluff more than normal.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like 6 handed, but it seems to go down to 2 or 3 handed very quickly. that is a bit too much for me. I like to play with 6 or 7 players at a table, so its a fine line.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok i can not crack 10 handed game for some reason I lost 30 dollars in it moved to 6 handed and won 40 wtf is that shouldnt there be more money in 10 handed?!?!?!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
damn im at 50 bucks i will be away for couple days need to evaluate game see where im messing up catch up with u guys in couple days.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I do the exact same thing. At a 10 handed limit table, due to me sticking to the premium hands and playing aggressive I can make good profit. But in a six handed game, I try to play the same way and always end up breaking even or coming out slightly ahead due to the blinds.
And I'm talking about ring games, not SnGs |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
For some reason, I've had better luck the last couple of days going 6 handed.
|
![]() |
|
|