MINbet poker (again)

[eejit101]

good point. id raised the last couple of hands before so didnt want to seem like too much of a raising guy, and lose value when i bluff in the future

[eejit101]

im not as good as JD then


Table 'Jupiter IV' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: bogey54 ($1700 in chips)
Seat 2: malka18 ($1203 in chips)
Seat 4: big_tommyt ($1495.50 in chips)
Seat 7: eeejit101 ($1140.75 in chips)
Seat 8: D$onDaFLoP ($1990 in chips)
Seat 9: ElkY ($2097 in chips)
bogey54: posts small blind $10
malka18: posts big blind $20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to eeejit101 [Ac Kd]
big_tommyt: raises $40 to $60
eeejit101 is disconnected
eeejit101 is connected
eeejit101: raises $100 to $160 like/dislike????
D$onDaFLoP: folds
ElkY: folds
bogey54: folds
malka18: calls $160
big_tommyt: folds
*** FLOP *** [9c Jc Kc]
malka18: bets $220
eeejit101: raises $760.75 to $980.75 and is all-in again, like/dislike?
malka18: calls $760.75
*** TURN *** [9c Jc Kc] [As]
*** RIVER *** [9c Jc Kc As] [Js]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
malka18: shows [2c 3c] (a flush, King high)
eeejit101: mucks hand
malka18 collected $2348.50 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2351.50 | Rake $3
Board [9c Jc Kc As Js]
Seat 2: malka18 (big blind) showed [2c 3c] and won ($2348.50) with a flush, King high
Seat 7: eeejit101 mucked [Ac Kd]

[MAYHEM45]

MINbet holdem = LIMIT holdem

Buying in for less that the max at NL is gayyyyy.

[JDMcNugent7]

yeah. i was gonna ask why the hell this thread was called MINbet and ur playing NL.

[eejit101]

yeah, good point, fancied trying it from a different way.

[PShabi]

Isn't the NL version called a "rampage" or something?

[jimmym]

Fuck Me ,,

EEEJIT $1140.75, I know you won 65k. but only a week ago this amount would be massive to you. Seriously dont you think your playing above your skill level.

I just feel in a couple of months you will be posting some sad stuff. Take time of , go on holiday, leave the poker alone for a bit.

[PShabi]

Ummm, I think you missed the point of the whole "minbet" thingy.

[jimmym]

I did , see he started with 80, sorry eeejit.

[PShabi]

Either way, I still think it's a pretty stupid idea, unless you're mega-rich and bored. Limit's another story, cause if you build up huge, you don't really run the risk of busting in one hand like this.

[Talking Poker]

Exactly. I may give it a go (limit) one of these days... Someone should start a new thread, explaining how it works, and list the minimum buy ins needed for each level. Then people could give it a go. We could even make a contest out of it.