It's all about the Iron, baby...

[JDMcNugent7]

The huge tables is the only thing that keeps me from playing FT.

When i play 3/6 on stars i always play 7 or 8, and playing 4 Stars 4 FT doesn't work because they get off synch and dont pop up at the right time which makes it akward.

As soon as Full Tilt comes out with resizable tables I will probably play there only.

[JDMcNugent7]

Well I decided to grind 3/6 for awhile. Im gonna do this for a month or so probably. This limit is officially cursed for me, I've never ran good at it. I ran probably the worst I've ever run in one session today, -4k off the bat. Fun stuff.

[Talking Poker]

Well, I'll be damned. JD and I are playing the same limits. Never thought I'd see the day.

[Talking Poker]

27% vs 0% rakeback doesn't make it worth putting up with "huge tables?" Hell, take one month's RB payment and buy yourself a better monitor... or two new monitors, for that matter and set up dual screens like I have.

That's just a really lame excuse, IMO.... think about it from a $ standpoint, and I'm sure you will agree.

[JDMcNugent7]

So u think 27% rake on 4 tables will be better than an extra 4, 3/6 tables??

[Talking Poker]

No..... I think buying a better (or second) monitor with a FRACTION of the money you will earn with just one month's 27% RB will allow you to play 8 tables.... at 27% RB!!!

[Tony Cheval]

I have to agree with TP there, at your level it's well worth 'investing' some $$$ to improve your setup.

[omahilo]

you got 100K sitting around somewhere, dont be afraid to spend a few bucks on a better setup which will in time pay for itself then some.

[JDMcNugent7]

two main reasons i dont get a new setup:
1) I can 8 table fine on my little ass 13'' laptop with touchpad
2) Theres nowhere in my dorm where I'd really want it

[Boobie Lover]

To be fair, Stars isn't exactly 0% rakeback. It is more like 15% if JD's platinum.