Peyton or Brady?

[PShabi]

He's going to have to win 2 more to take that. You're jumping the gun a little. In the same category, sure, but he's still got plenty of work to do.

[Boobie Lover]

Let's see,

Brady vs. Denver defense - Brady got destroyed
Manning vs. Denver defense - picked apart the Denver defense


Brady is very good, but he is no where close to Manning's ability. You put any other QB on Indy's team and that team is below .500.

[GeoffM]

HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Best receiving corps in the league. Put Brady, Palmer, McNabb, etc. etc.etc, on Indy, and they are still 7-0.

Also, how about the Indy line holding on every play and not a single call against it.

[PShabi]

Okay, Geoff. That's more "Lol" than Boobie's under .500 comment.

[GeoffM]

You're probably right, I just hate Indy.

Actually, I'm one of the people that think technically there could be a holding call on the line every snap.

[melioris]

I ain't claiming he is there yet, I am just saying when it is all done he will be. Manning is more talented, IMO, but he lacks that intangible.

And Brady is doing it with a cheap as shit ownership. At least Montana had some mob money going into the team.

[GeoffM]

I don't know, Montana had much better options in his heyday than Brady. Montana's teams always had salary cap issues (AKA over the cap), and the Patriots have always been dramatically under. Also, the league is larger now than 15-20 years ago when Montana was winning rings.

I think Brady will go down as best ever, unless Manning finds a way to pocket 3 or 4 to match Brady.