|  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I can't argue with the preflop comments.  I almost pitched it, honestly (I wasn't going to shove with it).  Obviously I was willing to go broke on the flop with it if I paired my Ace (and possibly my T, depending on the flop), so for 200 more chips, I took a look. I know his play looks really goofy once you see his cards, but I actually like it. He just picked a (barely) bad time to do it. If I was any weaker, or if I didn't hit the flop, it would have worked. As for Salazar = Boobie, seems obvious to me too. I haven't banned him yet though, because as of yet, I don't have any IP proof that it is him, and not just someone who thinks/writes/plays exactly like him. Never mind. There it is. Time to ban him... yet again. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Eh I say fuck it and let him stay, it's been long enough. He hasn't been out of line on this account.... While he's "talking poker" let him stay, when/if he's out of line ban him
		 
				__________________ "Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I haven't kept track, but I'll guess that I've banned no less than a dozen accounts of his... maybe 15.  You guys probably aren't even aware of 75% of them. And no, he's going to serve out , which goes until 6/1. I should add days to it every time he comes back and makes a new account, but I get the feeling that if I did that, I'd end up doing it forever, since he obviously can't stay away from this place that gives him nothing as a poker player or as a person. Anyway, after then, if he wants to come back as The Storm, that's fine with me. But he's going to be on pretty much permanent probation. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |