|
|
|
|
#1
07-03-06, 11:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
nothing to do with this post, but i just played 200 hands of 2/4 after it some guy told my me AF was 18.4 . thats a big high. I was $220 up though. So....who knows! Those numbers look ok to me, but im not an expert |
|
#2
07-03-06, 11:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
200 is a pretty small sample size right?
__________________
"Some things you just can't question. Like you can't question why two plus two is four... it was put in my head that two plus two is four. So certain things happen. Why does it rain? Why am I sexy? I don't know." |
|
#4
07-04-06, 01:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are getting too worked up about the won at showdown % if you only have 1200 hands. Many of those pokertracker stats aren't even negligible until about 20,000 hands.
|
|
#5
07-04-06, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, I don't really think won at showdown % is that that great of a stat. Everyone I have over 5K hands has one around 47-54. If it is below that, you are probably just running bad.
|
|
#6
07-04-06, 10:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because a lot of the time a +EV call on the river in NL could have a W$SD around 25-33% (in the most simple situation of just calling a bet on the river), or do you have some other reason why you don't like this stat?
|
|
#7
07-04-06, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally, I think went to showdown % is a better statistic than won at showndown %. I suppose there is some merit in both stats, but they don't really materialize until you have far more hands than you currently do now.
|
|
#8
07-05-06, 02:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right...
Take a limit poker hand, for example: If you're getting 10:1 on a river call and you are winning 30% of these showdowns, that is HUGE +EV. Sure, you could start folding a lot more to increase your W$SD number, but that woud be killing much more important numbers, namely your BB/100. The same is true for NL, as you suggested. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
